How do we get students to focus on learning over getting
good grades?
This question stuck out the most to me during lecture this
past week.
Our textbook Interweaving Curriculum and Classroom
Assessment, makes the statement that “Once students (and their parents) and
teachers adopt a learning culture, as opposed to a mark-obsessed culture,
students will put in effort to improve performance” (Drake, Kolohon, &
Reid, 2014). In theory, I agree with this statement. If students become more
invested in WHAT they are learning, then students will want to learn MORE. This
desire to continually build knowledge in today’s world helps students to be
more involved citizens prepared with 21st Century skills;
effectively reaching the “goal” of education.
Source: http://effectiveteaching20112013.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/social-constructivism.png
The implementation of this learning culture however can be an intimidating task. Students today, including myself (as well as teachers), grew up
in an environment that focussed on grades. This accountability and need for
standardization is significantly present in a society with increased
technological developments changing our perceptions of what “knowledge” is. Students,
like myself, learn what they THINK the teacher WANTS them to know, and do not
actively challenge ideas presented by teachers because all they want to know is
how to get a good grade. The value of student learning today is measured not in
the effort put forward or the process, but in intelligence and talent. Assessment is thus OF learning and not FOR
learning.
Here is the video in class that really made me think about grade praising vs. effort praising:
Thinking back to the time I was in elementary school and high school, I can see that this happened quite a lot. I always listened to my teachers and did well on tests and assignments. I always got A’s and usually did this with minimal effort.
Now that this notion of a “learning culture” has been
brought to my attention, I can see how the mark-obsessed culture may have
hindered my actual learning. If I was motivated through feedback that
acknowledged my efforts and made areas of improvements easier to see, then I
might have applied myself to my schoolwork in a more fulfilling way.
Why does this matter if students are just going to be put
back into this traditional mark-obsessed culture once they move on to
post-secondary education?
This is a question I seem to be struggling with a lot. It is
hard to imagine that students can benefit in a culture of learning so different
from what they will face in post-secondary life. Furthermore, implementing a
learning culture so different from what is already embedded within their personal
story and cultural lenses will likely be welcomed with resistance. I can even see
this happening within our own class right now.
Will the project-based learning and collaborative assessment
techniques they will be accustomed to prepare them for the independent study and
the tight curriculum of the post-secondary world?
I believe that it can. From what I have heard in lecture and
read in Interweaving Curriculum and Classroom Assessment it is clear that the desire to self-improve
and self-assess can promote good study, research, and critical thinking
techniques that can allow students to adapt to different types of curriculum situations.
This desire to continually improve performance can enhance the student’s desire
to learn THROUGHOUT their schooling career and later in life. Learning thus becomes
personalized and student driven.
It is the notion of assessment AS learning instead of assessment OF learning that can foster a positive change in student’s lives. It is assessment AS learning that can align the processes of curriculum, instruction and assessment to allow students to effectively KNOW, DO and BE.
It is the notion of assessment AS learning instead of assessment OF learning that can foster a positive change in student’s lives. It is assessment AS learning that can align the processes of curriculum, instruction and assessment to allow students to effectively KNOW, DO and BE.
“Education is not preparation for life; education is life
itself.” – John Dewey
Drake, S. M., Kolohon, M., & Reid, J. L. (2014). Interweaving
Curriculum and Classroom Assessment: Engaging the 21st-Century Learner. Don
Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.


Your description of what your learned and why is pretty typical. How much of what you learned did you retain? And if yo did retain it why? I think you will find that you retained it because you used it in your life somehow - not memorized for a test or what the teacher wanted. Interesting that you see the resistance in class to actually practising AfL. yet our ultimate goal - as you rightfully point out is for a self-directed student who learns for the sake of learning. AaL becomes possible through technology and personalization. Not really a stretch when you see it in action. ;-)
ReplyDelete